Logo
Multiple Articles - Scroll Down
 
Consumers Cut Health Spending,

As Economic Downturn Takes Toll
By VANESSA FUHRMANS
As the credit crunch threatens to throw the economy into a deep slump, Americans are already cutting back on health care, a sector once thought to be invulnerable to recession. Spending on everything from doctors' appointments to preventive tests to prescription drugs is under pressure.
The number of prescriptions filled in the U.S. fell 0.5% in the first quarter and a steeper 1.97% in the second, compared with the same periods in 2007 -- the first negative quarters in at least a decade, according to data from market researcher IMS Health. Despite an aging and growing U.S. population, the number of physician office visits also has been declining since the end of 2006. Between July 2007 and 2008, the most recent month for which data are available, visits fell 1.2%, according to IMS.
As consumers cut back, spending on everything from doctors' appointments to preventive tests to prescription drugs is under pressure.
In a survey by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners last month, 22% of 686 consumers said that economy-related woes were causing them to go to the doctor less often. About 11% said they've scaled back on prescription drugs to save money. Some of the areas being hit include hip and knee replacements, mammograms, and visits to the emergency room, according to a survey conducted by D2Hawkeye Inc., a Waltham, Mass., medical data analytics firm, on behalf of The Wall Street Journal.
Since sales at the Sebring, Fla.-area car dealership where Christopher Pye works have dwindled, so have the commissions that were 40% of his income in good times. Barely able to afford his $850 monthly mortgage and pay for groceries, he says something had to give: his two young sons' annual medical checkups.
"It's just a little too expensive right now," says Mr. Pye, 32 years old, who says he can't afford to have his family on the company health plan or to pay up front for the visits. This month, Mr. Pye is canceling his own insurance, hoping the $56 he'll save in weekly premiums will pay for the exams of his boys, ages 3 and 4, later.
Health-policy experts say that patients' short-term care cutbacks could lead to more medical problems and higher spending down the road. As more people forgo screenings or wait until minor medical problems blow up into serious complications, hospital and emergency-room admissions could eventually spike.
"Once you've had that heart attack and end up in the hospital, that's when the expensive stuff begins," says Dana Goldman, director of health economics at the Rand Corp., a nonprofit research institute in Santa Monica, Calif.
Health-care companies say the current economic slump's impact on demand for medical services has been surprisingly swift. Laboratory Corp., the country's second-largest clinical lab-testing company by sales after Quest Diagnostics Inc., says the number of blood tests and other types of lab work it does for uninsured customers fell 8% in the second quarter, compared with the 1% quarterly growth it usually sees.
The company's analysis of outside market data also shows that obstetrician-gynecologist visits, the sole source of preventive care for many women, dropped 6% in the first quarter compared with the same period last year.
 
"That says to me that people are just deferring care if it's not acute," says Laboratory Corp.'s chief executive, David King.
Speaking at an investor conference this month, Walgreen Co. Chief Executive Jeffrey Rein said the U.S. is experiencing the "tightest prescription market" in his 27-year career, as more cash-strapped patients skip their pills or take half doses. He said the company has looked at different ways to get people to fill prescriptions. For example, pharmacists are reaching out to patients through phone calls and emotional appeals such as, "Do they want to be around when their kids grow up, or their grandkids?" Mr. Rein said.
Pricey Blood Test
Marianne Falacienski of Pensacola, Fla., had health coverage through her husband's land-surveyor job until he was laid off in April last year. Her husband, Brian, has since bought a policy for himself and their 2-year-old daughter on the individual market, but the family couldn't afford to include Ms. Falacienski, who has a chronic inflammatory bowel disease called Crohn's. The premiums charged by insurers for health plans purchased by individuals with pre-existing conditions can be prohibitive.
Ms. Falacienski, 33, has been putting off a pricey blood test to monitor her Crohn's-related anemia, which if it worsens, can indicate bleeding in the intestines. She says she already owes more than $3,000 for a blood transfusion she needed in January -- the result, she says, of skipping the tests last year and thus failing to spot her worsening blood count in time.
"I'm just trying not to get sick again," she says. She found a receptionist job in July but won't be eligible for its health benefits until late fall.
A recent analysis of claims from 250,000 people in several dozen mid-Atlantic employer health plans suggests even people with coverage are cutting back on care. The study, conducted for The Wall Street Journal by research firm D2Hawkeye, found that a number of preventive or nonacute areas of care saw declines despite little change in benefits or employee cost-sharing. Knee replacements per 1,000 people fell 18.6% between March 2008 and March 2007, pap smears fell 6% and dispensed prescriptions for antidepressants dropped 29%, the D2Hawkeye analysis shows.
Jim King, a family physician in Selmer, Tenn., says patient visits at his practice this summer were down 10% to 15% compared with summers past, even though 90% of his patients have some form of insurance. A big problem, he says, is getting patients to come back for tests to check their diabetes or to act on referrals to specialists, many of whom are at least 40 miles away in Jackson, Tenn.
"It's hard to get people to follow up when they're having to decide between the gas bill, the electric bill or deciding to come in and see the doctor," Dr. King says.
Many insured Americans face much bigger out-of-pocket costs today than just a decade ago. The average family plan deductible at an employer last year ranged from $759 for health-maintenance organizations to $3,596 for a high-deductible plan with a savings-account option, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. The cost of premiums to employees has nearly doubled to $3,281 a year since 2001.
People who buy health plans on their own often face even higher deductibles. Patricia Campbell of San Diego bought a $7,500 deductible plan after she took fewer freelance television production assignments to help care for her mother, who has Alzheimer's disease.
Her doctor has told her that the longer she waits to get a cataract in her left eye removed, the harder it will be. But she says she can't afford to pay for the surgery because she is still paying off her share of the costs of an appendectomy last year. "Since I don't work out of the home, it's not that crucial," she reasons. "And I can drive with one eye."
Gabrielle Kenna, 33, who suffers from debilitating rheumatoid arthritis, says she occasionally skips her weekly dose of methotrexate. The pills help with pain and inflammation, and require a $10 monthly co-pay. But Ms. Kenna says she has to balance that with the price of her main medication, a specialty drug called Remicade that costs her nearly $180 every six weeks. "When I'm not feeling so bad, I'll try to stretch [the methotrexate] out or wait until I have the money," she says.
That task is about to get tougher now that her job as a school social worker in Fort Wayne, Ind., has been cut to a part-time position. Beginning this month, she'll no longer have health benefits. To stay on the school district's plan for a temporary period under federal Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, or Cobra, rules, she'll have to pay $570 a month in premiums.
Her mother, Edith Kenna, says she has been skipping her osteoporosis drug every other week and stopped taking her antidepressant, each of which require a $40 monthly co-pay, to help pay for her daughter's treatments. But, she worries about the day her daughter's Cobra benefits run out since Remicade can cost more than $12,000 a year.
Hitting the Coverage Gap
Medicare beneficiaries on fixed incomes say higher energy and food prices are making it tougher for them to pay for drugs as well, even those who have the government program's drug benefit. Some, like Joan Stroup of Butte, Mont., are starting to hit the drug plan's coverage gap, which is $3,215 this year. The gap in 2008 begins after beneficiaries and their plans pay $2,510 in drug costs, at which point plans aren't required to pay benefits until spending reaches $5,725. Then benefits kick in again.
For Ms. Stroup, a 73-year-old retired elementary-school principal, that means paying roughly $1,000 a month for various medications until she's bridged the gap. To make do, Mrs. Stroup says she's been skipping her asthma medication Advair, sometimes a week at a time, and switched to a cheaper but less effective pill for her acid reflux. "I don't always want to tell people I don't have the money for it," she says, "so I might wait a week or so to go to the drugstore to pick it up."

 ===================================================================================================Source: ProWEB Wire (Industry News)
Drugs are a hefty factor in health care costs
Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Researchers at Buck Consultant recently conducted a survey of 150 employers, finding that for approximately 29 percent of employers that offer prescription benefits, pharmacy benefits account for over 20 percent of total health plan costs.

According to the report, pharmacy benefits account for 16 percent to 20 percent of total health care costs at 37 percent of the participating employers. Additionally, the Buck Consultants researchers noted that 99 percent of participating employers said they offer prescription drug coverage.

Finally, the survey revealed that employers often have trouble understanding their pharmacy benefits costs. For example, about 28 percent of the participating employers did not know how much money their plans spend on expensive specialty medications.
 
=====================================================================================================
 
Medical Debt Sending Many Over Financial Brink
Experts say soaring health costs and medical crises fuel many foreclosures, bankruptcies
Posted October 28, 2008

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter
TUESDAY, Oct. 28 (HealthDay News) --Since 1999, Keith and Deborah Krinsky of Magalia, Calif., have seen their health insurance deductible soar from $1,000 to $10,000.
And their health-care costs have put them in a financial hole.
A combination of Keith's chronic asthma and potential heart problems, Deborah's connective tissue disorder and fallen arches, and their kids' various scrapes and stumbles led them to amass a pile of credit card debt and forced them to refinance the mortgage on their house -- which they now are having trouble paying.
Keith, once a plant manager for a trucking company in Chico, took a $30,000 pay cut to get a job with better health benefits. Deborah, who doesn't work because of her disability, said they are still fighting desperately to stave off foreclosure.
"Right now, we are in the process of losing our home. We will probably go to my mother-in-law," Deborah said Monday.
The Krinskys are not alone in their scramble to make ends meet because of medical issues.
The connection between medical debt and the current credit crisis isn't a direct line, but it's strong enough to prompt Mike Leavitt, head of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, to declare at a recent news conference, "If we had any idea how many mortgages were foreclosed because people were crowded out by medical issues . . . Health-care costs are at the heart of many of the things happening."
A Kaiser Family Foundation poll conducted in April, way ahead of the current economic meltdown, found that 28 percent of Americans reported that they or their families had had a serious problem paying health insurance or medical bills because of changes in the economy.
And data from the Commonwealth Fund puts 41 percent of working-age adults -- 72 million people -- as having medical debt or having a problem paying medical bills, up from 34 percent -- or 58 million people -- in 2005.
Many families find themselves managing until a crisis sends them over the edge. "The way people get in trouble is have substantial debt they're managing, they're paying mortgages and paying off credit card balances, but they're managing. Then a shock occurs," said Dr. Steffie Woolhandler, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard Medical School and co-author of a medical bankruptcy paper from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project. "In bankruptcy, in about half of those cases, that shock is a medical shock."
"The shock often takes the form of higher bills. It can also take the form of higher bills and loss of work because you're sick," added Woolhandler, who is an advocate of national health insurance.
This is what happened to Donna Smith and her husband, Larry.
The Smiths, who raised six children together, consistently had employer-sponsored health insurance. Like the Krinskys, however, they began to notice a drift upwards in the cost of premiums as well as higher co-pays and higher deductibles in the 1990s.
"While we were both well, we could absorb that creep," said Donna, formerly a newspaper editor and now a community organizer for the California Nurses Association and the National Nurses Organizing Committee in Chicago.
But then the medical crises set in: Larry was diagnosed with serious artery disease, Donna with uterine cancer.
"Our debt was accelerating, but it wasn't just accelerating in medical debt," Donna said. "What you do is you hang on, you borrow from another place and pay the doctor. It's a balancing act all the time." The Smiths took payday loans, Donna pawned her engagement ring, and they even crawled to relatives.
"I can't tell you how humiliating it is," Donna said. "By the time you've gone through that kind of trauma, you've tapped out the good will of family and friends. You call them, and their tone of voice changes. You've damaged personal relationships. People are less excited about seeing you."
By 2004, their health insurance policy had a maximum out-of-pocket exposure of $9,000, and they were sued by a dermatologist for an unpaid bill. The amount? A mere $600.
Donna's wages were garnished, and the couple were forced to declared bankruptcy and sold their house for pennies on the dollar, all while they were technically fully insured.
The couple first moved in with a daughter living in Colorado and are now renting in Chicago.
"I don't know if we have enough working years left to buy a house," Donna said. "That's pretty heavy punishment for having gotten sick."
 ===================================================================================================
 
Business Week Article:  Health Benefits Special Report October 15, 2008
Health Benefits: Medicare's Costly Doughnut Hole
Seniors dread this time of year, when they run out of Medicare drug coverage and have to pay out of pocket. Some just stop taking their drugs
For many older Americans, this is a bitter time of year with a deceptively sweet name: the "doughnut hole."
It's not a treat from the local bakery, but rather a coverage gap in the three-year-old Medicare Part D drug program. When Part D was first designed as a way to help elderly patients pay for their prescription drugs, the only way the federal government could afford it was to impose a yearly limit on what it would cover for each member. So once seniors consume drugs up to that threshold—it is $2,510 in 2008—they fall into the doughnut hole. They then have to pay fully out of pocket for their drugs until the end of the year, or until they're eligible for catastrophic coverage, whichever comes first.
The doughnut hole has been a source of angst ever since Part D began in 2004. Now we know why: One way seniors deal with being in the hole is to stop taking their drugs.
More than 3 Million Affected
Only recently have pollsters been able to quantify the fallout of the doughnut hole. In August, the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation released results of a survey showing that in 2007, 26% of Part D beneficiaries—3.4 million people—reached the doughnut hole. Part D plans are offered and managed by private insurance companies, so the particulars differ among the 1,600 or so plans that are available. But on average, Part D patients who fell into the doughnut hole saw their monthly out-of-pocket costs double to $196.
Even more alarming was that the study found 15% of people with chronic illnesses stopped taking drugs during the time they were in the coverage gap. "High drug costs are a barrier, but this is the first time we're seeing it documented so plainly," says Tricia Neuman, vice-president at Kaiser Family Foundation, a Menlo Park (Calif.) health research organization. "This raises concerns about the consequences for people with serious chronic conditions."
So what is the purpose of the doughnut hole exactly? It was the only solution to a simple problem: The federal government, which is expected to spend between $395 billion and $534 billion on Part D benefits through 2013, didn't allocate a big enough budget to the program to subsidize an unlimited supply of drugs for every beneficiary. Some of the insurance companies that sell Part D plans offer options that cover drugs during the gap. But, says David Certner, legislative policy director for AARP, "those plans cost more and they only cover generic drugs."
Reconsidering Retirement
Since seniors already have to pay premiums and co-pays on their Part D plans, many choose to risk falling into the hole rather than to pay more for the chance of staying out of it.
Larry Kay of Yukaipa, Calif., is having so much trouble affording the doughnut hole that he's thinking about coming out of retirement. Kay, a former quality-control inspector for a fencing company, hit the hole in May and is now paying $650 a month for drugs to treat his high cholesterol and the lung condition chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or COPD. "One is $162, another is $226," he says, rattling the exact prices off the top of his head with the tone of both familiarity and annoyance. "They don't have generics."
Kay's pension of $1,198 per month (after taxes) leaves little left over for other essentials. So he has stopped taking his COPD inhaler in the morning, even though he's not supposed to skip doses. "If my doctor knew, he'd be very upset."
Filling the Hole: Different Ideas
Health policy experts believe that the next Administration will be under pressure to address the doughnut hole, and both candidates have expressed some support for reforming the program. Senator Barack Obama (D-Ill.) endorses the idea of letting the government negotiate drug prices for Part D (it doesn't have the right to do so now). Senator John McCain (R-Ariz.) has said that higher-income beneficiaries should pay higher premiums for their Part D plans.
Both ideas—dropping drug prices and shifting more of the up-front premiums to members who can afford to pay—have been bandied about in Washington as potential ways of at least shrinking the doughnut hole without the government having to pony up more to support Part D. The prospect of a $700 billion bailout of the financial industry is certainly taking attention away from health-care reform, but there is little doubt the next President will place the doughnut hole high on his agenda.
"There is a growing recognition that the doughnut hole is impairing people's access to medications," says Dr. Carolyn Clancy, director of the Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality in Rockville, Md., a public service agency of the U.S. Health & Human Services Dept.
Premiums Are Set to Jump
Meantime, the doughnut hole is exacerbating a growing Medicare financial burden on seniors. On Sept. 26, health-care advisory firm Avalere Health released a report predicting Part D beneficiaries will see their premiums rise 24% on average, to $37 a month, in 2009. Those who joined the 10 most popular plans will swallow a 30% increase.
"One frustration seniors voice is that they go through the deductible, then they fall into the gap, then a new year comes around and they have to start all over again," says Karen Fletcher, a spokesperson for California Health Advocates, which assists Medicare beneficiaries.
Some drug companies offer assistance programs, Fletcher says, but only for the lowest-income seniors, and only for those willing to endure a tough application process.
Those who watch Part D carefully worry that some patients may be cutting back on their drug intake altogether to avoid the doughnut hole, even if they're endangering their health by doing so.
"Is the program better than what they had before? Yes," says Judy Lave, chair of health policy and management at the University of Pittsburgh, referring to the fact that most seniors had little or no drug coverage prior to Part D. "But can we design it better? Yes."
======================================================================================================
 
Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report
Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Coverage & Access
Number, Percentage of Uninsured U.S. Residents Decreased in 2007, According to U.S. Census Bureau
      The number and percentage of uninsured U.S. residents declined in 2007 to 45.7 million people, or 15.3% of the population, according to an annual U.S. Census Bureau report released Tuesday, USA Today reports (Cauchon/Appleby, USA Today, 8/27). In 2006, 47 million people were uninsured, or 15.8% of the population (Alonso-Zaldivar, AP/Kansas City Star, 8/26). For the report, researchers analyzed data from the Current Population Survey of the 50 states and Washington, D.C. (U.S. Census Bureau release, 8/26). The survey found that:
·    The number of people with health insurance increased to 253.4 million in 2007 from 249.8 million in 2006 (Little, Chicago Tribune, 8/27);
·    11%, or 8.1 million, of U.S. children younger than age 18 were uninsured, down from 11.7%, or 8.7 million, in 2006 (Dunham, Reuters, 8/26);
·    The proportion of people with private coverage dropped to 67.5% from 67.9%;
·    The proportion of people with employer-sponsored coverage fell to 59.3% in 2007 from 59.7% in 2006, although the number of people with employer-based insurance was not statistically different from 2006 (Girion, Los Angeles Times, 8/27);
·    The proportion of people with any type of public coverage grew to 27.8% from 27.0% in 2006;
·    Uninsurance rates differed by race, with 32.1% of Hispanics uninsured in 2007, down from 34.1% in 2006, remaining the group with the highest percentage of uninsured. Uninsurance rates for blacks decreased from 20.5% to 19.5% during the period. The rate for whites declined from 10.8% to 10.4%, and the rate for Asian-Americans was up from 15.5% in 2006 to 16.8% in 2007 (New York Times graphic, 8/27);
·    Massachusetts ranked first overall among states in the proportion of residents with health coverage, with 92.1% covered (Smith, Boston Globe, 8/27); and
·    Texas ranked last among states with 24.4% of residents having no health coverage (Urbina, New York Times, 8/27).
 
=====================================================================================================
 
Report: Health insurance costs rising faster than pay

Health premiums rose 83%; wages increased 11%
, report says

By Daniel Lee
daniel.lee@indystar.com

Wages are failing to keep up with escalating health insurance premiums being paid by Hoosier families, while insurance companies are offering less coverage, according to a new report.

Premiums for employer-based health insurance in Indiana rose 83.4 percent from 2000 to 2007, compared with a jump of only 11.4 percent in workers' wages over that time, according to the analysis released Tuesday by consumer advocacy group Families USA. That means the prices of premiums rose 7.3 times faster than workers' pay.

That gave Indiana the fourth- widest gap between workers' earnings and premium prices. Michigan and Ohio, Indiana's neighbors in the troubled industrial Midwest, ranked first and second.

"What is so surprising about these numbers is that these premiums increased despite the fact that (they) . . . now pay for thinner coverage," said Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA, a nonprofit advocacy group based in Washington, D.C.

Workers also face more out-of-pocket costs for their care through higher deductibles, co-pays or co-insurance -- all expenses that come on top of premiums.

Annual premiums for family coverage in Indiana rose from $6,628 in 2000 to $12,153 in 2007, a jump of 83.4 percent, according to the report. Over that same time, Indiana workers' median earnings increased from $24,531 to $27,330, an 11.4 percent jump.

The worker's portion of premiums for that family coverage more than doubled between 2000 and 2007, from $1,319 to $2,844.

"This is a national problem," said Pollack, speaking on a conference call with reporters Tuesday. "It really will require national leadership."

Families USA said its report is based on data from the federal government, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Census Bureau and the Department of Labor.

Pollack pointed to waste in the nation's commercial insurance system, noting that money from premiums goes to profits, marketing and administrative costs as well as to care.

Pollack said the increased use of information technology could also help reduce costly medical errors.

David Roos, executive director of the advocacy group Covering Kids and Families in Indiana, pointed to spending requirements included in the state's new Healthy Indiana Plan for low-income Hoosiers. Roos took part in the Families USA conference call.

The Healthy Indiana Plan requires that 85 cents of every premium dollar be spent on benefits, according to WellPoint's Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, which helps administer the plan.

Robert Hillman, president of Anthem in Indiana, said other factors also contribute to rising premiums. He said Central Indiana's hospital-building boom has added to costs.

Hillman also said those with commercial insurance pay higher rates in part to help pay for care of the uninsured or of people on government programs such as Medicaid, which often reimburse at rates lower than a hospital's cost.

"No hospital or physician could live on reimbursement that the government is paying them," Hillman said.

Health insurance premiums in Indiana are likely to continue their rapid rise.

Steve Gregory, director of business development for Indianapolis insurance broker DeTrude and Co., said he expects premiums for employer-based coverage to rise roughly 7 to 9 percent for 2009.

Those increases, he said, come even as many businesses have had to give workers no or small raises because of the tough economy.

In response, Gregory said some employers are looking to keep premiums affordable by switching to high-deductible plans. With many high-deductible accounts, people may put money in a tax-free health-savings account to pay for medical expenses.
 
=====================================================================================================